The Assassination of John F. KennedyFACT 

The assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963 has elicited some odd conspiracies, but understandable enough considering the circumstances and his fame and popularity. Unlike my article on the Queen being a shapeshifter, this theory/theories really does have some credibility and possibility to it, so It’ll be easier to report on them. Let’s start with a brief list of the different theories that have been fabricated from this tragedy:

  1. Public Opinion
  2. Possible Evidence of a Cover-Up
    Alleged witness intimidation
    Confiscated film and photographs
    Withheld documents
  3. Tampering with evidence
    Photographs
    The zapruder film
    Kennedy’s body
  4. Fabrication of evidence
    Murder weapon
    Bullets and cartridges

5. Allegations of multiple gunmen
Number of shots
Origin of the shots
6. Testimony of eyewitnesses
7. Physical evidence
8. Film & Photographic evidence
9. Medical evidence
10. Oswald’s Markmanship
       role of Oswald
11. Alternative gunmen 

Public Opinion

According to author John C. McAdams, the JFK conspiracy theory is one of the greatest. Others have actually referred to it as ‘the mother of conspiracy theories’, with most Americans genuinely believing that there was a conspiracy to kill JFK. This information was according to multiple polls directed towards the masses, both polls show that a minority and also a majority of Americans believe the government was engaged in this. 
 These same polls also show no agreement on who else may have been involved in the shooting. A 2003 Gallup Poll reported that 75% of Americans don’t believe that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.
That same year, an ABC News poll found that 70% of the public that voted suspected that the assassination involved more than one person. 66% of Americans thought there had been a conspiracy while 74% believed that there was a cover-up.
 
As recently as 2009, some 76% of people polled for CBS News said they believed the President had been killed as the result of a conspiracy.
 

Possible Evidence of a Cover-up

Numerous researchers, author Mark Lane, Henry Hurt, Michael L. Kurtz, Gerald D. McKnight, Anthony Summers, and Harold Weisberg, have pointed out what they characterize as inconsistencies, oversights, exclusions of evidence, errors, changing stories, or changes made to witness testimony in the official Warren Commission investigation, which they say could suggest a cover-up.

Michael Benson wrote that the Warren Commission received only information supplied to it by the FBI, and that its purpose was to rubber stamp the lone gunman theory.

“James H. Fetzer took issue with a 1998 statement from Federal Judge and Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) Chairman John R. Tunheim, who stated that no “smoking guns” indicating a conspiracy or cover-up were discovered during their efforts in the early 1990s to declassify documents related to the assassination. Fetzer identified 16 “smoking guns” that he claims prove the official narrative is impossible, and therefore a conspiracy and cover-up occurred. He also claims that evidence released by the ARRB substantiates these concerns. These include problems with bullet trajectories, the murder weapon, the ammunition used, inconsistencies between the Warren Commission’s account and the autopsy findings, inconsistencies between the autopsy findings and what was reported by witnesses at the scene of the murder, eyewitness accounts that conflict with x-rays taken of the President’s body, indications that the diagrams and photos of the President’s brain in the National Archives are not the President’s, testimony by those who took and processed the autopsy photos that the photos were altered, created, or destroyed, indications that the Zapruder film had been tampered with, allegations that the Warren Commission’s version of events conflicts with news reports from the scene of the murder, an alleged change to the motorcade route that facilitated the assassination, an alleged lax Secret Service and local law enforcement security, and statements made by people who claim that they had knowledge of, or participated in, a conspiracy to kill the President.”

Allegations of witness tampering, intimidation and foul play

Richard Buyer wrote that many witnesses whose statements pointed to a conspiracy were either ignored or intimidated by the Warren Commission.

In JFK: The Last Dissenting Witness, a 1992 biography of Jean Hill, Bill Sloan wrote that Warren Commission assistance counsel Arlen Specter attempted to humiliate, discredit, and intimidate Hill into changing her story. Hill also told Sloan that she was abused by Secret Service agents, harassed by the FBI, and received death threats. This means that the whole investigation was of course compromised, and the public cannot trust any sources as even the witnesses could be lying of paid. To this day the investigation still isn’t fully solved and remains a mystery based on the mere fact that so many people of authority and power could have paid any ‘eye-witnesses’ to keep quiet, to cover their asses.

Witness deaths

Allegations of mysterious or suspicious deaths of witnesses connected with the Kennedy assassination originated with Penn Jones, Jr., and were brought to national attention by the 1973 film Executive Action.

Jim Marrs later presented a list of 103 people he believed died “convenient deaths” under suspicious circumstances. He noted that the deaths were grouped around investigations conducted by the Warren Commission, New Orleans D.A. Jim Garrison, the Senate Intelligence Committee, and the House Select Committee on Assassinations.

Vincent Bugliosi described the death of journalist Dorothy Kilgallen—who said she was granted a private interview with Jack Ruby—as “perhaps the most prominent mysterious death” cited by assassination researchers.

According to author Jerome Kroth, Mafia figures Sam Giancana, John Roselli, Carlos Prio, Jimmy Hoffa, Charles Nicoletti, Leo Moceri, Richard Cain, Salvatore Granello, and Dave Yaras were likely murdered to prevent them from revealing their knowledge.

“Vincent T. Bugliosi, Jr. (/ˌbuːliˈoʊsi/; August 18, 1934 – June 6, 2015) was an American attorney and New York Times bestselling author. During his eight years in the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, which included 21 murder convictions, without a single loss. He was best known for prosecuting Charles Manson and other defendants accused of the seven Tate–LaBianca murders of August 9–10, 1969. Although Manson did not physically participate in the murders at Sharon Tate’s home, Bugliosi used circumstantial evidence to show that he had orchestrated the killings.” -Wikipedia, Vincent Bugliosi

Related Article:  Is Michelle Obama a Man?

Tell us what you think...

Click on a heart to rate it!

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

We are sorry that this article was not useful for you.

Help us improve this article!

Author

I'm Kate Pibernik and I love to write! I'm currently studying media and film looking to one day become a full-time media journalist that specializes in short-films and media production. I'm also co-author of an upcoming book.

About The Author

Kate Pibernik I'm Kate Pibernik and I love to write! I'm currently studying media and film looking to one day become a full-time media journalist that specializes in short-films and media production. I'm also co-author of an upcoming book.
Please Login to comment

What do YOU think? Share YOUR thoughts with us...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of